Skip to content
Expertise

Architecture in action

Examine the context, engineering decisions and delivery approach behind three published client architecture engagements.

  • Executive sponsors
  • IT managers
  • Project managers
  • Architects and engineering leaders

Named work. Specific engineering problems.

Aquatic Informatics needed repeatable mixed-workload delivery, Clearly needed a scalable ecommerce foundation, and KPU evaluated GPU-enabled learning environments. Each story connects the problem to the architecture approach.

Explore the collection

  • Aquatic Informatics: repeatable delivery for mixed workloads
  • Clearly: a resilient foundation for peak ecommerce demand
  • KPU: GPU learning environments beyond the lab

Assess relevance to your environment

Look for a similar dependency or operating constraint rather than a promise to reuse another client’s design. Your workload, risk and acceptance criteria determine the next engagement.

Frequently asked questions

Questions and answers

What client architecture work can we evaluate?

Aquatic Informatics needed repeatable mixed-workload delivery, Clearly needed a scalable ecommerce foundation, and KPU evaluated GPU-enabled learning environments. Each story connects the problem to the architecture approach.

#
How should we choose a next step?

Look for a similar dependency or operating constraint rather than a promise to reuse another client’s design. Your workload, risk and acceptance criteria determine the next engagement.

#
A clearer starting point

Your next cloud decision starts here.

Tell us about your environment, priorities and next cloud decision.